Sean Spicer Just Contradicted Trump’s Claim Earlier About Don Jr’s Meeting

The White House just isn’t on the same page. It’s been an ongoing problem with the Trump administration. Typically, the White House will defend the former reality show star, then Trump will tweet something that implicates himself while throwing his staff under the bus. But this time, it was White House press secretary Sean Spicer who said the exact opposite of what the amateur president tweeted earlier to defend his son who held a meeting in 2016 with a Kremlin-connected lawyer in order to gather damaging information on his father’s rival, Hillary Clinton.

The press briefing was off-camera again. The last on-camera press briefing was held on June 29th.

“Most politicians would have gone to a meeting like the one Don jr attended in order to get info on an opponent. That’s politics!” Trump tweeted this morning.

Peter Baker, White House correspondent for the New York Times, just tweeted, ‘@PressSec says “there was nothing as far as we know that would lead anyone to believe” that Don Jr. meeting wasn’t about adoption policy.’

Again, though, Trump said his son “attended in order to get info on an opponent.”

Twitter users responded.

Donald Trump Jr. admitted it in the emails so there’s that, too.

The right wing narrative lately has been that collusion is not illegal so it was OK to team up with a hostile foreign government. Junior has changed his story at least four times now. Trump says he didn’t know about the meeting which was in his building while he was in New York, with his son-in-law Jared Kushner attending, along with former campaign manager Paul Manafort. And now we’re supposed to believe it was about adoption.

Flashback: The Magnitsky Act was signed into law by President Barack Obama in retaliation to human rights suffered by a journalist. The journalist, Sergei Magnitsky, was beaten then died days later under mysterious circumstances. In response, Vladimir Putin banned the practice by Americans of adopting Russian children.

So, even at a stretch, if we were to believe Spicer and not Trump, the Magnitsky Act should remain law so what is there to talk about?

Photo by Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images.

Terms of Service

Leave a Reply